Article 398. Consequences of non-fulfillment of the obligation to transfer an individually-defined thing.

In the event of non-fulfillment of the obligation to transfer an individually-determined thing to the property, economic management, operational management or to the use of the creditor for value, the latter has the right to demand that the debtor be taken away from the debtor and transferred to the creditor under the conditions stipulated by the obligation. This right disappears if the item has already been transferred to a third party who has the right of ownership, economic management or operational management. If a thing has not yet been transferred, the advantage is that of the creditors, in whose favor the obligation arose earlier, and if it cannot be established, the one who had previously filed a lawsuit. Instead of the requirement to transfer to him the thing that is the subject of the obligation, the creditor has the right to demand compensation for damages.

<< Article 397 TKRF Back to table of contents Article 399 TKRF >>

References to other articles of chapter 25. Responsibility for violation of obligations:
Article 393. The duty of the debtor to pay damages.
Article 394. Losses and penalties.
Article 395. Responsibility for the default of a monetary obligation.
Article 396. Responsibility and fulfillment of obligations in kind.
Article 397. Fulfillment of an obligation at the expense of the debtor.
Article 399. Subsidiary liability.
Article 400. Limitations on liability for obligations.
Article 401. Grounds for liability for breach of obligation.
Article 402. The responsibility of the debtor for its employees.
Article 403. The responsibility of the debtor for the actions of third parties.
Article 404. Wines of a creditor.
Article 405. The delay of the debtor.
Article 406. Delay of a creditor.